Armored Brigade II by Slitherine/Matrix a tutorial by Joe Beard

 This is a video tutorial of the newly released Armored Brigade II

by our good friend Joe Beard

https://youtu.be/ILB_RGTIAso

Thank you very much Joe!

SONG FOR WAR

FROM

INVICTA REX GAMES

RELAUNCHING SOON

In 2023, I reviewed and immediately pledged to the Kickstarter for Song For War when it was launched.  An outstanding game reviewed enthusiastically by myself and many far more well-known names, such as Zilla Blitz and Andrew & Grant of The Players Aid.  Much to my disappointment and the disappointment of many more, its ambitious target eventually wasn't met.  But from the outset, Chris and Seth, who formed Invicta Rex Games, had encouraged comments, ideas and advice and these have helped inform their subsequent planning. 

So here we are on the verge of that re-launch in 2025 and I'd like to fill you in on what to expect.  But first, if this is the first time you've heard of the game, I'd suggest having a look at my original review at this link Song For War and at some of the many other reviews on this game.  But first just a quick reminder of what everything looks like when set out.

My focus today is going to be specifically on the single major new development.  This development had already been under consideration by the guys at Invicta Rex even before the gaming community started suggesting it. It was a request for some shorter scenarios and that's just what the new launch provides.  These two new Scenarios are Italy and North Africa.  What’s even more important is that you're being offered even more choice.  You'll be able to pledge for  the whole Song for War: Mediterranean Theatre with these two new Scenarios or you can choose to pledge for a separate package Song For War: Mediterranean Operations containing just the two Scenarios.

What’s the difference?

Song For War: Mediterranean Theatre contains all that was previously covered by the first launch.  But now on the reverse of one of the two amazing mounted boards is a new map focusing on Italy and its surrounding seas and on the other map’s reverse is a similar closer focus on North Africa and the bordering Mediterranean.  This is an amazing addition, as the following pictures show.   First of all, Italy.

Followed by North Africa - at a slightly tilted angle!

Both retain the gloriously vibrant map colours of their parent map.  To accompany these two new maps and their respective Scenarios

come some modifications to the rules to reflect the more detailed picture that this narrower geographical and historical focus allows, as well as the omission of the National Support Phase from the whole theatre game’s rules.

However, if you want something a little lighter, whether on your pocket, your shelf or your playing time, this smaller game [and that word smaller is a very misleading one] Song For War: Mediterranean Operations will be a stunning buy in its own right with a single mounted board with the two maps on opposite sides.  I hope I've whetted your appetite and in a few months time, curtesy of Invicta Rex Games, I shall be able to give you an even better detailed view and review of my own copy of this separate game. Personally, I shall still be pledging for the whole Mediterranean game as well, but that's my choice.

Meanwhile here are just a couple of highlights to savour.

The Allies land at Salerno

Tobruk - will it fall or not?  It's up to you!

 PHANTOM FURY

FROM

NUTS PUBLISHING

First published in 2011,  Phantom Fury was my initial reason some years ago for contacting Nuts Publishing in hopes of reviewing it for A Wargamers Needful Things.  A copy by then was sadly unobtainable and, though I’ve had the opportunity to review many excellent games from Nuts Publishing since then, I’ve always harboured the desire to review that earlier game. Until now, the nearest to my wish being granted was Urban Operations which included a scenario on 2nd Fallujah.

After a long wait, however, at last the oft-promised second edition of Phantom Fury is in my hands and currently on my gaming table with many thanks to Nuts Publishing for this review copy.   

The physical quality of the new release displays all the familiar advances in component production, especially in the counters that are substantially thicker and benefit from their easy to press out, rounded edges.

Similarly the two play aids are on glossy card stock.  The first being a double-sided Sequence of Play, the other a single-sided presentation of all the necessary tables.

The map, though essentially identical to the original, has undergone one or two major important changes. With the original, the location background strongly emerged, while the Zones and Locations critical for play disappeared into that background.

Whereas the new presentation reverses that process, making play substantially easier.

As a result things like the various record tracks create a stylish impression, while the Zones become easily readable.  At the groundfloor level you have the Courtyard distinguished by its red colour, the letter C and a small door symbol, subsequent levels have a connecting arrow, with usually one or two rooms until you reach the Roof marked in black and with the letter R.   Though identical in these respects to the first edition map, the ability to read them at a glance stands as a huge improvement in game play. In addition, as you can see, the outlying borders displaying the Turn track, VP track and various holding boxes, has been given a much stronger palate.  All this adds to the visual enjoyment of the game.

From visuals, we come to the situation which is broadly the USMC [United States Marine Corps] tasked with securing the town of Fallujah.  The focus is specifically on the morning of 9th November 2004 and the 3rd Battalion 1st Marines in the Jolan District in the north-west of the town.  Despite this attention to detail, it's hard not to view the game as a generic slice of any Middle East conflict involving a broadly typical action.   

The top two rows of counters are your enemy Insurgents, while the smaller counters below them are mainly the Suspect markers which are what will be the first that will be placed on the map as you approach each Zone.  When these are rolled for revelation, there's a 50% chance nothing will be there. When real opponents appear, they are an anonymous force of two types of unit, labelled Guerrillas and Martyrs, which you randomly draw from the familiar cup or bag.

This might seem appropriate for the sort of enemy and situation presented here, but your own troops are an equally simplified and faceless bunch.   Their only individuality lies in their strength factors, ranging from 4-6 and that a small number of them can be assigned a CAAT support marker which can be used 4 times to add +2 to Fire actions or Assault actions.

As the design is expressly noted as being based very strongly on an article entitled  "Infantry Squad Tactics.  Some of the lessons learned during MOUT [Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain] in the battle of Fallujah", published in the Marine Corps Gazette, I'm sure the elements involved are accurate.  Nevertheless, I consistently felt I was gaming a system, rather than a specific historical event.

That said, I enjoyed every minute of that gaming and the lack of individuality to the units may be a help in not focusing on the horrors of modern warfare.  What you do experience is the grinding progress, block by block, using fire and movement tactics to advance and assault block by block.  

Early progress in the south-east quadrant of the map

You’ll encounter the deadly dangers of crossing streets, unless you have the one and only  M1A1 Abrams tank in the locale and the endless uncertainty of Suspect markers and actions that reveal them.  You have a 50% chance that each one will prove to be nothing there, but I can assure you that I haven’t yet played a session where the number of negative sightings is anywhere near the number of actual Insurgents revealed!  You’ll face the difficulties of fighting your way upward from floor to floor of a building or the potentially swifter task of fighting from the roof down.

Virtually all your efforts depend on your Marines, with only 4 squads having the benefit of CAAT support being attached [these give an +2 bonus to fire or assault rolls].  Each of your turns begins with the ability to attempt call in some of a very, very limited number of additional missions.  In all, there are only four Dragon Eye aerial vehicle reports that merely identify suspected insurgents, two AH-1W Super Cobra close air support missions and a single F/A-18 Hornet.  Even your attempts to call these in have their dangers, as a failure to call in the mission allows a random Insurgent reaction to take place.

One feature that makes this system all the more engrossing is that there is no enemy turn as such.  Instead virtually all Insurgent action takes place as reactions to your individual actions.  Mainly these are Defensive Fire attacks when you enter a building and simultaneous fire when you are assaulting from one level of a building to the next level.

Green markers indicate Zones still under Insurgent control

Though the imbalance of the strength of your Marines against the Insurgents’ strengths is markedly in your favour, the reverse is true of the number of their units as compared to yours. You begin with 9 squads have 3 more squads as reinforcements and can take a further 3 squads at the cost of losing VPs and finally will gain 3 Iraqi squads.  The latter are absolutely essential as they are the only ones allowed to enter the area’s mosque.

To avoid automatic defeat, you have 16 turns [13 turns if you play the historical variant!] in which to clear and control every one of the 61 zones on the map.  If you avoid defeat, your tally of victory points may earn you anything from a major victory to a costly victory. Time and the number of zones to fight through and eventually control makes this a very tough task.

I've found it an uphill struggle to achieve any level of victory, but Phantom Fury has the supreme quality for a successful solo game, namely the minute that I finish one play, I want to set it up and start all over again.

My final thoughts are on the rulebook which is equally attractive.  As, I believe, it is identical to the first edition's, that is a good recommendation for its quality and clarity.  It's extensively illustrated with examples through out the text and complemented by a very good example of a turn's play.

A section of the example of a Turn's play

The layout and organisation takes you easily through the Sequence of Play with concise but very clear rules' sections.  As there are a significant number of original concepts to represent the features of urban warfare, initially I found myself frequently checking the rule book to make sure that I was getting things right  purely because of their unfamiliarity.  However within less than half the 16 turns of my first game, I was playing swiftly with hardly any further checking.  What I've found even more satisfying is that a very swift glance over the rules when I return for another game is all that's necessary to have me playing very smoothly once again.  It's a very immersive experience where you are focused wholly in the action and the situation.  As a result those rather faceless-seeming men under your command suddenly take on a very personal degree of commitment and interest on your part.

I give Phantom Fury a strong thumbs up!  Get this 2nd edition while you can.

  

Hellas: History of the Ancient Seas I

by

Sound of Drums

 Once again, we are headed to the era of classical Greece. Only this time we will add the smashing of timber to the sound of hoplites crashing into one another. Sparta and Athens are locked in a deadly duel for the hegemony of Greece. Both sides have allies and mighty warriors and great generals on their side. You can hear the shouts of Brasidas and Alcibiades in the distance, along with a hundred or more generals. Pericles had put Athens into a position where she could fight an all-out war for about a decade (contrary to popular belief, rowers were usually not slaves and were highly trained war machines), and war is not cheap. Athens depends on its famous 'Wooden Walls' to keep the foe at bay. Sparta is nearly unbeatable on land. The contest at times resembles a fight between a dolphin and a bear. They each bellow at each other waiting to try and come to grips with the enemy.

 This is what comes with the game:

1 large 84 x 60cm mounted map board

241 wooden playing pieces

38 playing cards

74 Talent coins

2 recessed double layer Player Sheets

 for tracking Troops & income

2 Play Tracks for development & Resource tracking

2 Play Aids with Resource Icons, Cost Table, and Stability Status

"Archimedes" solo mode Rules & Cards

1 Rulebook

The second edition includes a printed German & French Rulebook

Historical Period: Ancients

Game Length: 180 minutes

Players: 1-2 Players

Age: 14+ years

Complexity: 5/10

Solitaire: yes

This is another one of them newfangled 'Eurogames' that we here have heard about. Heck, this here game even comes with Meeples! Meeples no less. All kidding aside, this is another game that shows us that a wargame does not have to fit into a tiny little hex covered hole. Yes, you can have your cake and eat it too. Hellas is a delightful wargame that is trussed up in its Sunday finest to give you both great gameplay and sartorial splendor.

The map and box are large ones. It also comes mounted; truth be told an unmounted map is getting harder to find these days. The map is a beautiful reproduction of a map from ancient times.

The names of the cities and areas are all done so that Thucydides himself could find his way around it. The shape and distances have been a played with, so that all of the important areas of the Peloponnesian War fit on the map. The map consists of areas and cities. It runs from Sicily in the east to Ionia in the west. It is extremely colorful and very vibrant looking; this of course fits the Eurogame model. 

I could go on and list every different Player Aid that comes with the game. It would probably just bore you though. They are all mounted and are just as much artwork as the map is. It is good to be a wargamer in 2024. The wooden meeples etc. are another fantastic

addition to this wonderful game. There are two Rulebooks. One is for the game rules, and the other is for the 'Archimedes' solitaire play. The Rulebooks are in full color and are in magazine form.

The cards are also well done. However, they are the only parts of the game that I would consider 'average'. They fit right in, but do not really have an artistic flourish about them. 

The game plays as either a solitaire or two-player one. One player is the Spartan player and the other the Athenian. You can play the game as an empire builder or more of a strictly wargame. The game itself is pretty easy to learn and play. However, the nuances of play give you a myriad of choices. The player is given so many choices in their fight for hegemony of Ancient Greece. There is a 'normal' setup for the game and a Peloponnesian War scenario. The only thing about the Peloponnesian War scenario that gives me pause is the starting

talents, money, for both sides along with how much income both sides bring in. The scenario has Sparta having more in the bank and more coming in than Athens. I do not believe that is historical, at least until Persia opened its purse to Sparta. So, you have economic warfare along with land and sea. This game is dripping in historical immersion. 

 Play is relatively quick and very fun. While it might look like Axis & Allies 400 B.C.E. it is definitely not. You need to have your thinking cap on to come up with a coherent long-term strategy. 

The game also has three expansions. These are:

 I New Markets - This expansion makes it so the merchandise that is shown on the map for all of the different areas is to be now random. 

 II Pirates and Barbarians - These two new additions to the game are placed by the player but are controlled by the AI. They could help your side or turn against you in a heartbeat.

 III New Armies - This comes with wooden blocks and stickers. This adds the Fog of War to the game.

 This is what Sound of Drums has to say about Hellas:

"The game series “History of the Ancient Seas” is the ultimate journey through these exciting times. Build new fleets in your city to explore unknown lands, conquer islands and build a great empire.

In HELLAS, the first installment in the “History of the Ancient Seas” game series, you will lead one of two great City States – Athens or Sparta.

HELLAS is originally a two-player game, but the “Archimedes” solitaire bot allows you to play HELLAS in full solitaire mode!

Your goal is to become the leading empire in known world. To achieve this, you will need to build armies and fleets to increase your military might, expand trade routes, conquer islands and provinces, develop your military skills, economic efficiency and culture, while always keeping an eye on the wealth, happiness and stability of your people.

The game is played in highly interactive micro-impulses. The heart of the game is the “action cycle”. An action chosen by a player can’t be chosen by the other player in his upcoming segment. And each action can only be chosen a limited number of times each turn. There is always more you need to do than you can actually do.

You will move your wooden meeples (representing legions, ships, armies and fleets) across the beautifully illustrated map from the center of the Hellenistic world to the shores of Persia in the east and the sandy beaches of Sicily in the west to expand your trade network and increase your trading status.

War or peace: That is your decision! You can expand your empire by leading your people to war! But war is costly, and the outcome is uncertain. You can lead your empire to the golden age of civilization by keeping the peace and bringing stability and wealth to your people without following the path of war. Offer terms to aggressive enemies to distract or delay them, but always be prepared to defend your empire."

 Thank you, Sound of Drums, for allowing me to take this game out for a spin. I have to use that worn out phrase 'easy to learn and hard to master' to help describe it. For anyone who is into gaming and Ancient History this is the cat's meow. However, if you are just looking for a great playing and easy to learn game this is also your cup of tea.

 This is a little teaser about Sound of Drums 'Battles of Napoleon' series. I will have a review forthcoming on Eylau 1807. This is what Sound of Drums has to say:

"The bloody winter battle of EYLAU 1807 will be the first volume in this series. Special rules like the possibility to launch a massive cavalry charge and features like snowstorms, Russian Cossacks and the French Guard add distinctive flavor of the battle. 

EYLAU 1807 will contain 1020 large (5/9”) counters, 2 huge maps (each 22”x33”), charts and tables.

Marc von Martial, one of the best graphic artists in the business, is in charge of the artwork. Gamers can expect beautiful era style maps and counters, and they will not be disappointed by his skills and love for the detail. 

The first volume EYLAU 1807 is a great hit on Gamefound and is shipping early 2024. It will be followed closely by QUATRE BRAS 1815 and LIGNY 1815. The collection of data, like precise orders of battles, map research for WATERLOO 1815, BORODINO 1812 and AUSTERLITZ 1805 are in the works."

Volume I: EYLAU 1807 (released & shipping)

Volume II: QUATRE BRAS 1815

Volume III: LIGNY 1815

Volume IV: WATERLOO 1815

Volume V: BORODINO 1812

Volume VI: AUSTERLITZ 1805

Volume VII: DRESDEN 1813

Robert

Sound of Drums

Hellas: History of the Ancient Seas I

Battles of Napoleon

 Alone in the Mountains

Solitaire Expansion for Afghanistan Graveyard of Empires '85

by

Flying Pig Games

 This is the third component of a scheduled 3 reviews/looks at the game '85 Afghanistan: Graveyard of Empires and this solitaire expansion for it. The year is 1985 and the Soviet Union is dealing with the morass that they encountered when they invaded and staged a coup in Afghanistan. It has now been six years and counting with the Soviet Union seeing no end in sight of the war.

 The main point of attraction of Flying Pig Games for us older grognards is the sheer size of the components in their games. We can actually see and manipulate the counters. This is besides the absolute wonderful gameplay, which is not at the cost of historical accuracy. These Vietnam and other Cold War wargames are of the tactical flavor. Here are the other games that belong to the Squad Battles Series:

'65 Squad-Level Combat in the Jungles of Vietnam

'95: The Years of Sorrow

 Flying Pig Games also has these tactical games about Modern War and slightly beyond:

The Long Road: World War III... With a Twist (This has some Sci-Fi and horror elements that you can add to the gameplay.)

Armageddon War: Platoon Level Combat in the End War

 They also have an incredible line-up of Civil War games and their large award-winning World War II Old School Tactical wargames.

 However, let us get to the task at hand and look at this solitaire expansion.

The full counter sheet

 This is what comes with the game:

1 -11" x 17" geomorphic map, that is compatible with the Graveyard of Empires maps

1 - Sheet of additional 1" counters

1 - Full color Rules and Scenarios booklet

27 - Solitaire Action Cards

2 - Full color Player Aid Cards

Close-up of a card and the counters

Bot rules

  I would like to say that there is something stupendously new about Alone in the Mountains. Unfortunately, I cannot. Possibly, not for the reasons you are thinking. The solo bot in this game is just a slightly refined solo experience from other Flying Pigs Games. This means that you get a full-fledged solo experience instead of just a tacked on one in the end. Their solo bot experience is like you are playing another player, albeit not a player who has his mind elsewhere and not on the game. 

 The game comes with six scenarios. However, it is extremely easy to develop your own for the main game as well, if you are so inclined. 

 The game itself, along with the expansion, is a treat for someone who would like to play a tactical game from the Cold War era. 

A close-up of some of the counters from the expansion

The news from Flying Pig Games is that more spectacular gaming goodness is heading our way. It may seem over the top, but try it, you'll like it Mikey. 

The first is another volume in the Old School Tactical library: Old School Tactical V4: Italian Theater 1943-45 and its expansion For the Empire.

Next up, is their treatment of the Battle of Chickamauga by Hermann Luttmann Rock of Chickamauga. This is a follow-up to their blockbuster A Most Fearful Sacrifice game about the Battle of Gettysburg.  This is a link to the Kickstarter:

The Rock of Chickamauga by Mark H. Walker — Kickstarter

 I will have a review forthcoming on Old School Tactical V4: The Italian Theater 1943-45.

Robert

These are the other two parts to my review of Graveyard of Empires '85

Mark H. Walker's '85 Afghanistan: Graveyard of Empires by Flying Pig Games - A Wargamers Needful Things

Mark H. Walker's '85 Afghanistan: Graveyard of Empires by Flying Pig Games part Deux - A Wargamers Needful Things

Flying Pig Games

Best Strategic War Games | Flying Pig Games

Alone in the Mountains Solitaire Expansion for Afghanistan Graveyard of Empires '85

Flying Pig Games

'85 Afghanistan: Graveyard of Empires

Flying Pig Games

Norman Conquests 

Conflicts of the Normans and Their Successors 1053-1265

by

GMT Games

 The Nordmannorum, or Normannorum, (either has been used in Latin texts), burst forth from the north of Europe or Hell itself, according to the Roman Catholic Church. These were the people who went 'a Viking' (Viking actually being a verb and not a noun) all across Europe and some of Asia and North America. The first Northmen raid is usually listed as taking place in 793. From that one raid, a hurricane of death and destruction was unleashed. The southern Europeans did not really have any way to counter them. So, it became rather commonplace to offer them land and riches in return to defend the coast against others of their brethren. The Northmen would then become baptized and join the status quo. The most recognizable of these areas is the aptly named Normandy. Men of Iron Volume V follows through these Northmen to their sons, grandsons, and beyond. 

 The Men of Iron Series is composed of this game and four others:

Men of Iron - Warfare in the Middle Ages

Infidel - The Supremacy of Cavalry in the Crusader Era 11th - 12th Century

Blood & Roses - Battles of the War of the Roses 1455 - 1487

Arquebus - The Battles for Northern Italy 1495 - 1544

 GMT Games released a tri-pack of the first three games Men of Iron, Infidel, and Blood & Roses. Unfortunately, the first printing sold out, but it is on their P500 list for reprint.

Close-up of the front cover

A portion of the back of the box

 These are the battles that come in Norman Conquests:

Civitate 18 June 1053 – Normans from Sicily and southern Italy clash with the Pope and allies.

Fulford 20 September 1066 – Norwegians (Vikings) come to lay claim to the English throne. Saxon nobles raise their levy and give battle in northern England.

Stamford Bridge 25 September 1066 – Saxon King Harold II hurries north and catches the Norwegian invaders with their pants down.

Hastings 14 October 1066 – Saxon King Harold II hears of the Norman invasion of England and rushes south. Facing off with William, Duke of Normandy, on a hill in the south of England, Harold learns that arrows are pointy.

Tinchebrai 28 September 1106 – Lacking primogenitor, two of William’s children battle over his legacy. King Henry I of England and Robert, Duke of Normandy, face off in Normandy.

Lewes 14 May 1264 – King Henry III, great-great-grandson of Henry I, and a coalition of his Barons clash over Baronial rights.

Evesham 4 August 1265 – Edward (later Edward I, the Hammer of the Scots) fights Simon de Monfort to free his father King Henry III.

 Of the seven included battles, three of them are about the year 1066 and the two different invasions of England one by the Norse under King Harold Hardrada, and the other from Normandy under William the Bastard, soon to be William the Conqueror. The first battle, Civitate, might seem surprising to some. We are used to reading about the Popes and the Hohenstaufen Holy Roman Emperors meeting on the field of battle, or at least their followers. Robert Guiscard was not the leader of the Normans against the Pope at Civitate, but he was the one that won the battle that led to the Pope's capture. Robert was also the father of Bohemond of Antioch who figured so prominently in the First Crusade. Bohemond also has a big part to play in the other Men of Iron game Infidel about the battles in Outremer during the Crusades.

 The next battle, Tinchebrai, has two of William the Conqueror's sons fighting over the realms that William had left as his legacy. Lewes and Evesham are battles that were fought between the Plantagenet Kings of England and their barons, mostly because of John Lackland, or Softsword, and his losing battles to the barons.

 This is what GMT Games has to say about Norman Conquests:

"The Normans, and their successors, had a large impact on history. Normans, from Nortmann (northman), were originally Viking raiders that settled in what would now be northern France. Normans gained territory as far away as southern Italy and Sicily, and modern day Syria. They were Crusaders, they were Kings, they were princes, and they were scoundrels. They began as raiders from the north that fought on foot and transformed themselves into Dukes, Kings, and princes that fought from horseback.

How many games include a battle with a Papal army? Very few, so Norman Conquests visits Italy and the Norman Count of Apulia fighting with, and capturing, the Pope. Stretching the definition to include the Norwegian King Harald (III) Hardrada (undoubtedly a northman) and his invasion of England allows us to include all three battles for the throne of England in 1066, including the most famous Norman William the Conqueror and his invasion of England. Next we catch up with two sons of William I, the Duke of Normandy and the King of England, feuding over his lands years after his death. We end with the Baron’s War between William I’s great-great-great-grandson Henry III and his barons who were led by Simon de Montfort."

 This is what comes with the game:

Three 22" x 34" Maps (2 back-printed)

Two 1/4 Sheets of 9/16" Counters

Three Player Aid Cards

One Rules Manual

One Battle Book

Two 10-sided Dice

 I usually do not discuss/describe the box, but here I will make an exception. The box cover artwork is done by Kurt Miller and shows a Norman Knight on horseback facing numerous infantry. It could represent numerous battles, but it definitely gives me a Hastings vibe. The battle maps are split up as follows: 

Evesham and Lewes are full maps on the back of each other.

Stamford Bridge and Tinchebrai take up half a map each with Fulford and Civitate, both a half map, on the reverse side.

Hastings takes up a full one side of the last map.

 The maps are well done and the ones, like Hastings, that have a good amount of different terrain are very nice to look at. Most of the battles at this time were fought on flat featureless areas and the other maps represent this. There are two hard card stock Players Aids that come with the game. These are 11" x 17" foldouts They are in full color and have the different terrain charts for the seven different battles. They also have the Fire/Shock Tables and everything else the player needs. There is also a single-sided 8.5" x 11" that has the 'Flight Point Track' and the 'General Track. Next up is a 28-page Rules Manual. This is in full color. It is called the Norman Conquests/Men of Iron Tri-Pack Rules Manual. So, it has the rules for all four of those games (If you do not own the Men of Iron Tri-pack which has the games Men of Iron, Infidel, and Blood & Roses in it, you should really pick up these great games at a great bargain.) The Battle Book comes in at 24-pages and in essence is the scenario/battle playbook. It has the setups and any rules particular to each of the different battles. Included are also some examples of play. I have left the best for last. The two and 1/4 counter sheets are really well done. At 9/16" the counters are nice and large. The colors and the illustrations on them are superb. So, the game certainly measures up in the component category.

 The series was first designed by the master of wit and wisdom, Richard Berg (some might add venom to the mix). This game was designed by Ralph Shelton. Having played the original games, I believe Mr. Shelton has completely caught the essence of them. Whether this was done completely by thinking and playing or if it had a bit of necromancy thrown in, I am not certain. 

 The game rules are like a very advanced rock, paper, and scissors game, but really so is Napoleonic tactics. The player has to learn combined arms to be very proficient in the game. You cannot just launch your heavy cavalry every battle and expect to come out the winner. The timing of your armored horseman's attacks is crucial. Supposing, of course, that your troops are even able to move. I really like the 'Continuation Activation' mechanic used in the game series. This rule allows a player who has successfully activated one 'Battle' (Battle was the term for the separate units of an army at this time), to continue to attempt to activate another Battle or even an entire Army activation, if the player had just successfully activated his army. This captures the feel of momentum in battles. Each side is also given a certain number 'Seizure Counters', depending on the scenario, to be used in the game. If a player tries for Continuation Activation, the other player can try and negate this with one of his Seizure Counters. The reverse of the Seizure counters also has effects that effect the units in the game. These can rally your troops or disorder the enemy. 

 The battles are on the smaller side of what you usually see in hex and counter wargames. There is nothing wrong with this. It means that the games can be quicker, and the player is not drowning in stacks (although I really like that at times). The game system to me is like the Great Battles of History series, only on a more playable level. You still get the historical feel and immersion, but at a much more playable size. The length of the battles means that you do not need to have them setup on a table for a week or two, unless you want to and have the room. The games that I have played have been mostly fast and frenzied. You get to release thundering knights on their charges and also to counter-charge them at times. I have been a fan of the series for a bit and in my eyes the mantle has been taken over and GMT Games has another great release. Having some Norman blood in me, I can highly recommend the game.

 

Robert

GMT Games

GMT Games

Norman Conquests: Conflicts of the Normans and Their Successors 1053-1265 by GMT Games

GMT Games - Norman Conquests: Men of Iron Volume V

Men of Iron Tri-Pack 2nd printing P500

GMT Games - Men of Iron Tri-Pack, 2nd Printing

 Burden of Command Demo by Green Tree Games

Video Review by Joe Beard

 Some of you old time readers might remember our old friend Joe Beard. He had to move on to better and brighter things in his life, but now he has found the time to delve into video reviewing. I am pleased as punch to introduce you to A Wargamers Needful Things joining the 21st century. Without further ado, here it is:

https://youtu.be/gNObyx7mSv8?si=ack7Xo68C_XK2IOh

 Mark H. Walker's '85 Afghanistan: Graveyard of Empires

by

Flying Pig Games

Part Deux

 So, we left off with a bit of history about the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. The repercussions of that event are still being felt around the world. It directly led to the later US involvement in the 'Graveyard of Empires'. It is pretty hard to imagine that the timeline for all of these events up until now is only 45 years. However, this game deals specifically with the Soviet Union against the Afghanistan Mujahideen, a name the western countries have had to learn all about in the ensuing years.

 I can never play a game without a tie-in to a movie or a book that I am perusing at the time. In this case, I was presented with the game and had to find something to get me into the mood to play it. The movie 'The Beast', fit the bill nicely. The movie is about a T-55 and its crew in Afghanistan during the Soviet occupancy during the 1980s. It is an excellent movie about people fighting for their homeland. It also shows the savagery of the women against the invaders. Many times, during the centuries, invaders would be much better off being captured by the men they were fighting instead of their womenfolk. Well, that is enough of that, onto part deux. 

 For those of you not living under some strata of compressed earth Mark H. Walker's name should be well known. This is what his website has to say:

"Mark has been designing board and computer games for over a decade. In that time, he has designed over a dozen games and developed, produced, and published over 100 more. In November of 2014 Mark founded Flying Pig Games, a game company dedicated to publishing high-quality strategy games. In September off 2015, Mark opened the doors to a second game imprint, Tiny Battle Publishing. (I think you have to tack on just a few more years than a decade by now)"

 This game is the second in the series of 'Squad Level Battle Games' the first was '65 Squad-Level Combat in the Jungles of Vietnam'. Unfortunately, '65 is out of print but do yourself a favor and look for it in the resale market. One of Mr. Walker's axioms is 'the playing is the thing', meaning that the rules will be as condensed and easy to understand as possible, among other things. He wants the player to be playing and not reading a 100-page rulebook. This is shown in all of his designs that I have played, and '85 is no different. One other thing that his games are known for its size. I am not talking about table space. I am talking about the size of the counters, hexes, and the writing in the rulebooks etc. I am assuming because he is an old grognard he feels pity on the rest of us grumblers and our fading eyesight. 

 If you have played '65 you really only need to glance at the new rulebook to get up and running. As mentioned, the rulebook is extremely large in print and thin on length. It has both a Contents and an Index. If you cannot find your way around it, then I suggest that wargaming may not be your best choice for a hobby. To put it into perspective, this is a rulebook that deals with squad-level war in the almost modern battlefield. We are talking missiles and all the new-fangled weaponry that they had in the 1980s. To be able to make a rulebook for a game in the modern era that is also easy to read and understand, and also be terse, is pretty much unheard of. 

 These are some of the units you will be sing or fighting against:

T-55

T-62

BTR-70

BMP-1

Mi-24

RPG equipped infantry

Spetsnaz

DHSK

Numerous rifle equipped units

Commanders

 At first, it seems that fighting the bear that went over the mountain is pointless. However, if there ever was a country that guerilla war could thrive in it is Afghanistan. True, there are no jungles, but the terrain is tailor made for the defender. Without the 21st century's drones the battles devolve into small knife fights. The Russian player at times will feel like he is trying to kill a wasp with a 20lb sledgehammer. The trick for the Afghan player is not to have the sledgehammer land. The gameplay is fairly reminiscent of the US against the North Vietnamese in the game '65. In both the under armed side had best use Ali's axiom and 'Float like a butterfly and sting like a bee". The Soviet ability to use helicopters really puts you to the test when defending against them.

 

 This is a game on the squad-level. Each one of your units/counters means a lot. You cannot go crashing in guns blazing and not expect to not take horrific casualties. The eight scenarios are spread out among a varied amount of different type actions. The fact that you can receive any variation of the Action Cards means that each time you play a scenario it is different. You have no idea of what your enemy is holding in his hand, or you in yours. It will also be easy to make your own scenarios. If you are into historically accurate games where the game play is paramount, then look no further. This game has a huge amount of game play in it along with some of the largest counters I have ever seen. Thank you again Soaring Porcine Amusements for allowing me to review '85.

 The next part of the trilogy will deal with the solitaire expansion '85 Alone in the Mountains'.

Robert

Flying Pig Games:

Best Strategic War Games | Flying Pig Games

Mark H. Walker's '85 Afghanistan: Graveyard of Empires:

Flying Pig Games