Three Wings For The Red Baron 

Von Richtofen, Strategy, And Airplanes

by

Leon Bennett

 The book starts on April 21,1918, the day the Red Baron died. The only thing we are certain of on that day is Von Richtofen's death. The claims of who shot him down have been argued over for ninety-nine years. The author goes through all of the plausible, and some not so plausible, scenarios. Mr. Bennett does not come down firmly on any side, but leaves it to the reader to pick which scenario fits the actual known facts.

 The next chapter 'MIT and the triplane' shows us the results of testing in MIT's wind tunnel released in 1916. The results show the triplane as a loser to both a monoplane and biplane in everything except  when the planes near stall speed. In this the triplane is the clear winner.

 The book's whole premise is to find out why Germany, and specifically Von Richtofen, wanted a German triplane. I will say that the book leans heavily in parts on engineering examples and illustrations. This is not a knock on the book. I just want the reader to understand that the book isn't just a prose rundown of how and why the Fokker triplane was built. The book has pictures and diagrams on almost every page to explain to the reader how and why World War I engineers came up with the designs they did. One of the biggest take aways from the book is the fact that engineers across the world were well aware of all of the flaws of their designs, but due to material and lack of horsepower they did the best with what they had. 

 The book has these chapters:

Richtofen's Death

Roe And The Triplane

Curtiss And The Triplane

Spad And The Triplane

Sopwith And The Triplane

Richtofen Campaigns For A Triplane

The Disappointing Albatross D5A

Strategy: Trenchard vs Richtofen

Gunnery, Tactics, And The Triplane

Maneuverability And The Triplane

Combat Introduction And Engine Problems

Wings, Horns, And Death

The Bottom Line

  The author shows that the triplane was a slow aircraft compared to its rivals. Wait a minute, in the air isn't speed everything? Mr. Bennett goes on to show how the German strategic and tactical thinking made the triplane a great choice. They chose to fight a defensive war. Another startling fact is how many airplanes the Allies actually built. The difference between the two sides is staggering. When put in that context, it is no wonder that all the Germans could do was to fight a defensive airwar. 

 There is so much to the book I could write for hours and not do it justice. This book is meant for anyone with an interest in the  World War I airwar. 

Robert

Book: Three Wings for the Red Baron 
Author: Leon Bennett
Publisher: Helion&Company
Distributor: Casemate Publishers

1754 Conquest

by

Academy Games

 1754 saw the start of the last war between France and England for the control of the North American continent. It was the fourth of their colonial wars. The first three were:

King William's War 1688-1697

Queen Anne's War 1702-1713

King George's War  1744-1748

 This war, The French And Indian War, was going to be a fight to the finish to see who would finally gain control of the eastern part of the continent. At fist glance, it didn't seem to be much of a contest. The English Colonies had a population of 1 million, and New France had a population of about 50,000. For the first years of the war, the French won a string of victories. In the end, the sheer might of the British won the war.

 The game '1754 Conquest' wins the prize for the shortest rulebook I have ever seen. In total, it is eleven pages long, with four of them being a 'Historical review' of the war.

 The game is played with two to four players. The sides are:

French Canadians

French Regulars

British Colonials

British Regulars

 The game is played for three to eight rounds, and each round has five turns to it.Starting on round three the players start to check for 'Game end Conditions'. This is the same as 'sudden death' or something similar in other games.

 The turn sequence is:

1. Reinforcement Phase

2. Movement Phase

3. Battle Phase

4. Draw Cards Phase

 The game has one rule that really helps to duplicate the 'Fog Of War'. When rolling your die for a battle you can get a 'Command' roll on the die. At that time, the rolling player can use that 'Command' result to move their units into any adjacent areas, even ones that are already scheduled for battle. So say you have two adjacent areas. In one, both you and your opponent each have three units and in the adjacent area you both have one unit. If you get a 'command' roll you can, if you want, then move one of your units to the other area. Then you will have a 2:1 advantage in that area. I think it is a novel rule to help keep the players on their toes even though at the start of the battle round you can see everyone's units.

 The cards for the game add flavor and many various strategies. One of the strongest cards the 'British Regular' player can use is the 'William Johnson' card. He was the British Crown's ambassador to the First Nations. His influence among the Iroquois was immense. Joseph Brant's sister Molly Brant was his consort. When using this card for the entire turn, all Natives allied to the French become allied units to the 'British Regular' side.

 Speaking of them, the First Nations become an ally of whichever side, British of French, that place a unit in that First Nations territory. If the French or British move all of their pieces out of a First Nations territory that First Nation reverts to becoming independent, essentially neutral.

 The map is well done and mounted. The actual forces of both sides are small colored plastic squares. The cards, dice, and actual counters are of good quality, with the writing on them large enough for even me to read them.

 The game itself is on the lower end of the complexity scale. The setup is straight forward and the rules and game play are fast and deadly. This is a great game for two to four players that do not have much space or a very long time to play.  I believe it would be a perfect game to use as a conduit from a game like 'Risk' to introduce budding generals to the wargaming community.  Several of the Academy Games have been used by teachers to try and make history more hands on for their pupils.  

 Robert

Episode 2 of the podcast is up! This episode features a review of the movie Dunkirk, a look at what's been posted here on AWNT in the last few weeks, first impressions of Tokyo 42 and Space Tyrant, and finally a review of Legacy of the Weirdboy, the first DLC for Sanctus Reach. I hope you enjoy listening, and I am still very much open to feedback and suggestions. Thanks!

Joe Beard

GGWITW on Steam NOW

 

 

 

LINK TO GAME ON STEAM

Celebration Time

 

 

 

 Well the website has passed the 300,000 views mark since it's birth last April! Oh and it's the editors birthday today..double celebration!

 

We wouldn't be where we are today without all of your readers! So big thanks to each and everyone of you!

 

 

Fighting The Somme

by

Jack Sheldon

 Well gang, I am here to report that Jack Sheldon has done it once more. His numerous books on the German army in World War I have almost become the stuff of legends. They are not only jam packed with history, but also have tons of first hand accounts. 'Fighting on The Somme' is no different. There have been tons of books written about the battle from the British side, from paeans of praise for Haig to the more well known 'lions led by donkeys'. But you cannot have a battle with only one side, and this is where Jack Sheldon comes in. We have all read numerous accounts of the battles for the Schwaben redoubt, but now I know exactly why. It was the linchpin of the German defense. I will use the author's own words about the redoubt:

" The priority thus afforded to the vital ground (by the Germans) is in sharp contrast to the position adopted by General Haig, commander of the BEF, as recorded in his diary following a tense meeting with General Joffre during the evening of July 3d. 

"Joffre pointed out the importance of our getting Thievpal Hill ... I was considering the desirability of pressing my attack on Longueval ... at this General Joffre exploded in rage. 'He could not approve of it'. He 'ordered me to attack Thievpal and Pozieres ... The truth is the poor man cannot argue, nor can he easily read a map."

 "On the contrary, the fact of the matter is that, after two years of directing major battles against the German Army, Joffre had developed clear ideas about what was considered important by his enemies. he definitely could 'read a map', could spot a Schwerpunkt (point of main effort)  when he saw one, but the command relationships meant that he did not have the power to order General Haig to do anything." 

 The tragic part about the Schwaben redoubt is that it was captured on the first day of the Somme by British soldiers, only to be lost in a counter attack.

The chapters of the book are:

In the Beginning Were The Reformers

Falkenhayn's Folly: Sleepwalking To Near Disater

1st July 1916: The Battle For The Schwerpunkt

Haig Lets The Defence Off The Hook. 1st-15th july

Army Group Gallwitz: A Failed Experiment

Hindenburg And Ludendorff Pick Up The Pieces

Strained To Almost The Breaking Point

Pyrrhic Victory Or Bloody Stalemate 

 Falkenhayn (chief of the German Great general staff) was too interested in his operations at Verdun to 'bleed the French dry' to objectively listen to General Fritz Von Below and his warnings about the French and British looming attack on the Somme. Even after the Allied attack, Falkenhayn only reluctantly released troops from the charnel house of Verdun to the Somme area. So, in many ways the Battle of The Somme fulfilled its role in taking pressure off of the French Army at Verdun. It is true that the Allied, and especially the British Army, spilled much more blood than necessary at the time. The British Army was, in 1916, a force that had to deal with a lot of growing pains. Unfortunately they had to learn many things on the job. The author shows and explains these points and more.

 Mr. Sheldon has, as usual, done a superb job in showing us the thoughts, actions, and reasoning behind the German defense. His chore is made that much more difficult because of the loss of most of the Prussian records from WWI in 1945. He shows that the battle was a learning process for both Armies. The author ends the book with an insightful look at the battle as a whole, and its repercussions for both the German and Allied Armies.


Robert

Book: Fighting The Somme
Author: Jack Sheldon
Publisher: Pen And Sword
Distributor: Casemate Publishers

Mark Antony A Plain Blunt Man

by

 Paolo de Ruggiero 
  

 The author states on page 161:

"Suetonius is impartial and credible when he frowns in disgust at the image of a father, and son, after Phillipi, forced to roll die for who would survive, and then Octavian giggling at the suicide of the survivor in front of the body of the deceased. Let's read his comments:

"His conduct so disgusted the remainder of the prisoners, including Marcus Favonius, a well known imitator of Catos's, that while being led off in chains they courteously saluted Antony as Imperator, but abused Octavian to his face with the most obscene epithets".

 Historical figures, especially generals, are much like boxers or sports figures in general. We somewhat remember their glory, but always bring to mind their last attempt at fame, no matter how much it hurts to see the fall of the mighty. If Pompey had died of natural causes right after subduing the pirates, we would find library shelves full of him. If Caesar had survived the Ides only to fall to a Parthian arrow in defeat, would there be that many books about him? Mark Antony, much like many others, lived too long. He has had many books written about him and his last wife, but it is always about Antony the loser. The Gods have not been kind to Mark Antony. The winner always writes the history. So Antony is shown as a love-besotted fool, incapable of anything but obeying Cleopatra.

 The author is to be commended; he tries to set the historical record straight. Mark Antony was ruler of half of the Roman world, and he was Caesar's second in command. This is not revisionist history, but just history. You did not become ruler of half the Roman world then because of your name, you had to earn it. Through all of Antony's ups and downs he was respected by most of his countrymen. If he lost to the Parthians, so did many other Romans down through the years.

 Antony had three wives: Fulvia, Octavia, and Cleopatra. Cleo is the one who gets all the press. I think there should be a larger fan base for Fulvia. The first woman to be on Roman coins, she also led a civil war against Octavian for her husband. She was a firebrand who had helped all three of her husbands to work the Roman mob.

 The author raises many good questions, such as why does Plutarch despise Antony's suicide so much? It was considered noble to end ones life in such a way. Cato, Cassius, and Brutus etc. are not slandered for it, so why Antony? Plutarch's words:

"Antony took himself out of the world in a cowardly, pitiful, and ignoble manner, but still in time to prevent the enemy from having their person in his power".

 I will end with the author's words:

"Shortly thereafter, Marcus Antonius, cavalry commander, military Legate, Quaestor, Augur, Master of Horse, Consul, Procunsul, Enemy of the State, Triumvir, last leader of the Hellenistic world, exhaled his last breath between the arms of his lawfully wedded wife, Cleopatra VII Thea Philopater of the house of Lagos." 

Robert 

Book: Mark Antony A Plain Blunt Man

Author: Paolo de Ruggiero

Publisher: Pen And Sword

Distributor: Casemate Publishers